Where There’s a Rule, There’s a Way

By Lawrence

The article in Wired magazine is a great reminder to all traders of what modern trading is all about.

The article is not about trading, by the way. It is a story of a geological statistician, Mohan Srivastava, who cracked the code of a scratch-n-win game called tic-tac-toe without cheating. It happened in Toronto and was headline news several years ago in Toronto. Since then he continues to discover that the same problem exists in many other lottery tickets sold across North America.

Drawing strange parallels from the story on these lottery games and modern trading,

  • Both are highly computerized in their respective infrastructures
  • Players who participate without questioning the systems lose all the time in aggregated term
  • By design, both create the feeling of excitement and close chances to win to get their players hook onto the game
  • Both have so much common knowledge and assumptions associated with them that are wrong. e.g the lottery games are truly random and price actions are unpredictable

Other suggestions from the article draws some more (controversial) parallels,

  • Both are used by organized crimes to launder money
  • Both are there to give hope to the disadvantaged crowd but the hidden agenda is to suck up their money to feed the system
  • Both are so wired to computerization that patterns are bounded to emerge. i.e. computer generated tickets vs. algorithmic trading
  • Someone who can step outside of the system and look at the games in a different way can yield high probability winning formulas to beat these games

Isn’t that something to think about?

Share

Comments
  • geosing February 9, 2011 at 6:10 pm

    Excellent piece of work and analysis here. Both are certainly analogs of each other. I had read Mohan’s story before on the Wired magazine, but it never occurred to me to make the connection to something I engage in every single weekday! Good job.

    Aren’t you promoting the last stated “controversial” parallel through your educational material and daily analysis?

    Someone who can step outside of the system and look at the games in a different way can yield high probability winning formulas to beat these games

    May we call you the Don of this family? Now that’s something else to think about. 🙂

  • Lawrence Chan February 9, 2011 at 8:08 pm

    Controversial because academics have not accepted the fact yet. Once they have, authorities will likely close (or narrow) the door to trading.

  • You must be logged in to comment. Log in